Untitled 1
 
 
 
Rick has extensive experience in labor and employment law, personal injury, workers’ compensation, and civil rights matters. What follows is a brief summary of some of the cases he has handled through to successful conclusion. The following is not an exhaustive list of the cases Rick has handled.

First Responders
  Attempt to Remove Captains From the Bargaining Unit Fails

   The Law Offices of Rick Barry, P.C. is happy to have successfully assisted Local 1889, IAFF, in defeating the Mehlville Fire Protection District’s attempt to remove all of its Captains from the Bargaining Unit.

   The District’s Captains had been members of the Bargaining Unit for 42 years. The nature and scope of their duties had recently changed, but it was to give them less supervisory authority rather than more. The District made an ill-advised attempt, first before the Missouri State Board of Mediation, and when that failed, to St. Louis County Circuit Court, on appeal, to have Captains removed from the Bargaining Unit.

   The District’s argument was that Captains had been given more responsibilities in recent years as the District had grown in population. The District was unable to provide factual support for its position.

   We were able to provide the Board with an abundance of detailed evidence which overwhelmingly established that under the existing Board of Directors and Fire Chief the Captains had significantly less independence and authority than in the past.

   As of the date of this posting of this article the District had not filed an appeal to the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District.
THE WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE CARRIER
FALSEHOOD THAT KEEPS YOU FROM PROTECTING YOUR CAREER
This is written for first responders especially firefighters and paramedics. Workers’ Compensation (WC) defense insurance carriers have been running a new, below the radar campaign to discourage first responders from filing WC claims, or from hiring knowledgeable attorneys to assist them.

Here’s how it works.
The WC insurance carriers have figured out that most all of those in the Fire and EMS services are both dedicated to their careers and, in general, fairly well compensated in terms of pay and benefits.
To prevent you from reporting, filing or effectively pursuing WC claims they are spreading the falsehood that pursuing a WC claim and receiving an award causes you to be classified as a partially “disabled” person who might not, because of this “disability,” be able to perform the job.
In other words, the WC insurance carriers are getting richer than they already are by spreading the falsehood you will lose your job if you pursue a WC claim because in order to do so, you must accept being branded as a “disabled” person.
Their hoped for result, if they can fool you, is to eliminate or sharply reduce the number of WC claims filed.
The effect on the first responder community if they are successful could be disastrous.
WC is intended to back up first responders who are injured on the job, basically by providing you with a monetary “bonus” for the lingering effect of an on the job injury.
Most all on the job injuries sustained by first responders do not keep them from performing their full duties after they have recovered. If you have aches and pains you did not have before because of such things as injured knees, backs, shoulders or other body parts, you work around them and still do your job.
Many First Responders sustain multiple on the job injuries to different body parts in separate incidents during the course of their careers. Separate back, knee and shoulder injuries for example. Despite the scare the insurance companies are trying to put into you, it is unheard of for a First Responder who can do the job to lose their job simply because of a multiple injury history.
This WC carrier campaign depends on the confusion many have over the use of the term “disability” in the WC system. For example, if you hurt your shoulder on the job, make a claim and receive a monetary award, it is called an award for “permanent partial disability” (PPD). The use of the word disability does not mean you are considered to be a disabled person for the purposes of your job. It is just a word. The award does not raise issues about your being able to do the job. Those of you who receive these awards return to full duty with clearance from insurance carrier doctors who are eager to find you are able to do so because if they give an opinion you are not able to perform your job it increases the value of your WC claim and therefore the cost to the employer.
A documented WC claim settlement protects and preserves your career because it ensures your injury is classified as work related and you as still able to perform your job. Protect your career, your future and your family. Pursue your right to make a WC claim when you are injured on the job and seek experienced legal representation such as that provided by my firm.
Represented four fire fighters who alleged they were subjected to reverse racial discrimination by their Fire District employer, which ultimately lead to their terminations. Plaintiffs, all highly experienced and qualified employees, alleged their employer hired individuals who were not qualified and replaced Plaintiffs with them. These cases were ultimately settled to the satisfaction of all Plaintiffs.
Jason Grellner v. Troy Manning: Deputy Sheriff was injured on duty when, during the course of an investigation, he opened up a cooler on Manning’s property that contained anhydrous ammonia. Deputy Grellner inhaled the ammonia, causing serious injury. Rick obtained a jury verdict of $5,000,000.00.
Represented police officer who alleged that four days after he made it known to his governmental employer he was organizing employees and assisting them in joining a labor union, he was terminated. The case was settled to the satisfaction of Plaintiff.
Represented public sector employee who alleged her governmental employer discriminated against her because of her pregnancy and gender and because she reported to her supervisors that she was being sexually harassed by a fellow employee. The case was ultimately settled to the satisfaction of Plaintiff.
Represented police officer who was struck by a drunk driver while performing a routine traffic stop. Rick represented the officer in both his workers’ compensation claims and his claim against the drunk driver. Both cases were settled to the satisfaction of Plaintiff. Specifically, the claim against the drunk driver was settled for the policy limits of the coverage provided by his insurance carrier.
Represented fire fighter who had a heart attack as a result of smoke inhalation. Rick obtained a sizeable workers’ compensation recovery for him and he returned to full duty after treatment.
Represented police officer who was injured in a meth lab raid. The case was settled to the satisfaction of Plaintiff.
Represented police officer who was conducting routine traffic control at an event, when he was struck by a drunk driver who left the scene of the accident. The case was settled for the driver’s insurance policy limits. Rick also obtained a significant sum for the officer from the settlement of his workers’ compensation claim.
Represented a fire fighter and a paramedic who were responding to a call, when their ambulance was struck by a drunk driver, and tipped over, landing on both and seriously injuring them. Rick recovered the policy limits from the drunk driver’s insurance carrier, from both Plaintiff’s underinsured insurance carriers, and from their employers underinsured motorist carrier.
Represented a police officer who was struck by an uninsured drunk driver while in his patrol vehicle, performing traffic control duties. Rick recovered the policy limits of the officers own uninsured motorist insurance as well as the uninsured policy limits of his public employer.
Represented fire fighter paramedic who had a heart attack on a call in his workers’ compensation claim, recovering a sizeable settlement for him. The case was settled to the satisfaction of Plaintiff. The firefighter later returned to full duty.
Rick has represented many paramedics and fire fighters in obtaining workers’ compensation recoveries and returning to full duty, including injuries sustained during the course of training exercises.
Employees in the Private Sector
Represented numerous individuals who sustained repetitive work related injuries.
Represented an employee who alleged she was discriminated against by her employer because of her gender, was sexually harassed, and retaliated against after reporting the discrimination and sexual harassment. The case was settled to the satisfaction of the Plaintiff.
Motor Vehicle Accident Recoveries - Recent
Rick has had numerous recoveries for individuals who have been injured in a motor vehicle accidents, and has consistently been able to obtain the policy limits of the at fault parties insurance carriers.
Represented an individual who was rear-ended by an uninsured driver. The Plaintiff suffered serious injury, requiring surgery and significant physical therapy. The case was settled to the satisfaction of Plaintiff.
Represented an individual who was badly injured when he was struck by a tractor trailer. The case was settled to the satisfaction of Plaintiff for a large sum.
Represented an individual who suffered significant injuries in a slip and fall at a local retail establishment. The case was settled to the satisfaction of Plaintiff.
Recovered a large sum for a client from the client’s uninsured motorists coverage, whose recent knee replacement surgery had to be redone, after he was rear ended in a motor vehicle collision.
 
 

 

Link to article / press releases

By the time you read this, the Governor will have...

Link to article / website...
Mr. Leonard Griggs, Director St. Louis Airport...

Employees in the Private Sector
click here to read more...

Lots of good news!
click here to read more...
 
 
 

© 2011 Rick Barry, P.C. | (314) 918.8900 | 1750 South Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis MO 63144 | Contact | Legal Notice
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.
Neither the Supreme Court of Missouri nor The Missouri Bar reviews or approves certifying organizations or specialist designations.